Cruel Intentions 3

SKINOPSIS

So can somebody please explain to us why, even in terrible straight-to-video knock-off/sequels to Hollywood movies, lead actresses so rarely take their fucking tops off. Take, for example, Cruel Intentions 3. Now, we could deal (sort of) with the fact that Sarah Michelle Gellar exposed no flesh in the original, but she's SARAH MICHELLE GELLAR, right? A big fucking movie star and, even a perv like us, knows that big fucking movie stars don't take off their tops unless they're feeling especially beneficient/slutty. But we've never heard of Kristina Anapau, the Gellar stand-in here. Ever, But, still she shows nothing outside of a few bikini shots. What'd ya think Kris? That one day you'd be Sandra Bullock and this would turn out to be your Fire on the Amazon. No, no, no. You suck, you can't act and the only way you could've redeemed this trash is by showing your lead actress tits. And you didn't. The only girls who do are called Tara Carroll and Elizabeth McDonald who both get fucked by different dudes in the same montage as shitty, angst music plays. Both have nice tits, but let's face it: this is a B-movie made for cheap to capitalize on a bigger budget movie that people have actually heard of. That smells like exploitation. Next time, take the good parts of exploitation (i.e. tits) and give us more, damnit.